|
May 10, 2006 ÓHomer Kizer Commentary — From the Margins Good Seed in a Field of Tares The same
day that Jesus asked, ‘“Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?’” (Matt
12:48), indicating movement from physical family [birth parent & siblings]
to spiritual family [those disciples who do the will of the Father], Jesus also
related two parables that are central to understanding what has occurred and
what is occurring within the Body of Christ, the Church. Thus, days, now,
before the May 19th worldwide release of the movie The Da Vinci Code, directed by Ron
Howard and based on the best-selling novel, understanding these parables is the
challenge Christendom faces, a challenge central to the schism between the two
spiritual sons of Isaac that will be born of promise when the seven endtime
years of tribulation begin. The Apostle Paul begins an allegorical interpretation of Hagar
and Sarah in the 4th chapter of Galatians. He identifies Hagar with
Mount Sinai in Arabia (vv. 24-25),
and with present-day Jerusalem. He then identifies disciples with Isaac, saying
that they are children of promise and that the children of the slave shall not
inherit with the son of the free woman. He stops his allegory where he stops in
history, but the allegory itself continues: to the free woman is born a son,
who marries within his family and to whom sons are also born by promise (Gen
25:21). And about these two sons, the elder is hated [disrespected] by God
while the son is still in Rebekah’s womb whereas the younger is loved (Mal
1:2-3 & Rom 9:8-12). Both sons are of promise; both sons are of Isaac; and
both sons represent Christendom in the womb the last Eve. And within the same
context the Apostle Paul says that from the same lump of clay, the potter
creates one vessel for honored [special] usage, and one vessel for dishonorable
[ordinary] usage. One son will be born to the last Eve for honored service, one
for dishonorable service; one will be born loved, one hated even though neither
will have, at its birth, any sin reckoned against it. In the parable of the sower (Matt 13:1-9), seed is scattered on
the path, on stony soil, among the weeds, and on good soil where it brings
forth a hundredfold, sixty-fold, thirty-fold increase. The seed scattered on
the path corresponds to the seed that brings forth a hundredfold increase, and
as the seed on the path does nothing (i.e., has no growth, but is snatch away
before it sprouts), the correspondence itself [the fruit of both seeds added
together] equals a hundredfold increase. Therefore, in order of presentation,
the seed sown on rocky ground corresponds with the seed on good soil that
brings forth a sixty-fold increase, and the seed sown among the thorns
corresponds with the seed on good soil that brings forth a thirty-fold
increase. The seed on rocky ground sprouts, grows, but has no root, so when
faced with persecution or tribulation, the stalk of grain dies. Likewise, the
seed sown among thorns sprouts, grows large, but the cares of this world chokes
the word, and the stalk of grain dies. And each of these correspondences equals
a hundredfold increase; thus, the seed on stony soil would have brought forth a
forty-fold increase if it had not died, and the seed sown among thorns would
have brought forth a seventy-fold increase if the cares of the world had not
prevented it from ripening. So contained within the parable is a warning to
endure to the end, that doing good works in the name of Jesus and making many
disciples isn’t enough if later on persecution or the cares of this world can separate
the person from Christ—but nothing can separate those disciples whom the Father
foreknew, predestined, called and justified from the love of Christ (Rom
8:29-39). Yet persecution and the cares of this world will separate some
disciples from Christ. Scripture doesn’t contradict itself: what is at work is the
global condition of two sons being born of promise to the last Eve, both still
in the womb but one already hated [or not respected] and one loved. Christians,
today, are either hated by God, or loved. Yes, some are hated and not
respected, for they are lawless (Matt 5:19), and they are teachers of
lawlessness (Matt 7:21-23). God will not long tolerate being mocked by
disciples. The vessel doesn’t tell the potter when the vessel will come to the
wheel to be shaped. In the decades after Calvary, Christianity was a sect of
Judaism. But as the gospel entered Asia Minor, converts were of the nations; they were Greeks, and other
peoples absorbed in Greek culture and philosophy. And a hybridization of theology
occurred, for those converts pastoring Hellenistic fellowships didn’t
understand the movement from physical to spiritual without borrowing heavily
from Platonism. Hybrid grain grows larger and faster than open-pollinated
seed…when I was a child on a northern Indiana farm fifty-plus years ago, my dad
was an early grower of, and salesman for DeKalb
hybrid corn seed. He grew ears that reached from his elbow to his curled
fingertips. But Grandpa wouldn’t grow hybrid seed. Grandpa saved his own seed,
selecting the best from each year’s crop, but the ears of corn he grew were
only three-fourths as long as dad’s.
And the hybrids revolutionized American agriculture. Hybrid Christianity revolutionized Christendom. The Roman Church and the Orthodox Churches are the result of
hybridization. In the parable of the weeds (Matt 13:24-30), the farmer sowed
good seed on good soil, a field capable of bringing forth a hundredfold
increase. But at night, the Adversary sowed the field with weeds or tares—with
hybrid seed—that looks like the desired grain when it sprouts, but which brings
forth seed that doesn’t breed true. Grain only fit for pig feed. Grain the
farmer cannot plant back into the field if the farmer expects a reasonable
crop. When Jesus explained the parable of the tares to His disciples,
He said the field was the world and the one who sows good seed is the Son of
Man. The good seed is the children of the kingdom of heaven—those disciples who
are foreknown—and the tares are the sons of the evil one. The harvest is the
end of the age, and the weeds are left to grow among the children of God until
then. The hybrid corn is left to grow with the open-pollinated corn until both
are to be harvested, the hybrid grain first, when it will be gathered and
burned. All grains are wind pollinated, meaning that the sterile or
false pollen of the hybrids will fertilize the open-pollinated stalk, thereby
causing both stalks to make ears. But none of the ears will breed true. All
have been contaminated. And the one who sows will have to start over with good
seed, or spend centuries breeding out the false doctrines…nearly five centuries
ago, a remnant of Israel left spiritual Babylon to rebuild the house of God in
the Jerusalem above. This remnant has slowly trudged towards Jerusalem—has
trudged with the slowness of breeding out the genes of hybridization. Look at the splintered Churches of God from a historic
perspective: one generation of drawn disciples leaves the world, or leaves
broad-road Christianity, but the children of that generation, or the children
of its second generation—contaminated by the pollen of hybrid
Christianity—become hybrids themselves instead of continuing on the narrow path
leading to the Jerusalem above. My children are hybrids: they look at
themselves and see that they look how they are supposed to look, just as a
hybrid ear of corn looks like a bigger, better version of an open-pollinated
ear. But they now profane the Sabbaths of God as ancient Israel profaned these
Sabbath days. The man who, alone, for forty years carried the revelation
needed for typological exegesis to develop, with moist eyes, told me of his
sons who weren’t willing to lose ministerial employment over “doctrine.” This
man sat out WWII in a Conscientious Objector camp because of his Mennonite
upbringing, because he was not willing to compromise principle. But two of his
three sons—all three formerly employed by the most visible Sabbatarian Church
of God fellowship—gave up keeping the Sabbath to keep their jobs, and his third
son rejected the revelation he carried. The two sons are fully hybridized. The
third son is intellectually fossilized. And the decisions of his sons as they
reacted to the cross-pollenization of their faith deeply hurt this faithful
servant of God; yet, his sons believe they are still serving God as they now
preach hybrid mush and bone meal to their congregations. Hybrid corn yields more bushels per acre, but the seed has lower
protein content and will not extract certain trace minerals from the soil.
Hybrid Christianity has spread knowledge of Jesus Christ to every corner of the
globe, but its doesn’t teach converts to live as Jesus lived—and if a convert
will not live or attempt to live as Jesus lived, the convert will not enter the
kingdom of heaven. The encoded message of Scripture is that simple. But the hybridization of Christianity is not as simple. The
nation of natural Israel forms the visible, lively shadow of the Church, an
invisible nation of the heavenly realm that is bivouacked here on earth in
tents of flesh. So it is to the prophet Ezekiel where a disciple goes to see
the history of the Church in the heavenly realm, where no flesh can enter to
make direct observations or measurements. And what a disciple finds is that
because Israel would not put away the detestable things of Egypt, and would not
forsake idols, the nation that left Egypt and the children of that nation did
not walk in the ways of God and profaned His Sabbaths. Because the children’s
children did not repent and begin to walk in His ways and keep His Sabbaths,
God—yes! God Himself—gave Israel statutes that were not good, and rules by
which the nation could not have life (Ezek 20:25-26). Because of Israel’s
lawlessness, God defiled Israel by causing the nation to burn its firstborns to
a false deity, a practice Israel had already borrowed from its pagan neighbors
as Israel hybridized the commandments. From the shadow, disciples should realize that because the
Hellenistic Church borrowed theology from Plato and neo-Platonists, from
Paganism, God (Father and Son) caused the Church to defile herself by giving to
the Church traditions and the practices by which disciples cannot have life,
but will be thrown by their “parents” into the lake of fire. Thus, disciples
who continue in fellowships rooted in historical exegesis form that hated,
firstborn son of the last Eve. For what part of ‘“Do not think that I [Jesus]
have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets”’ (Matt 5:17) does the disciple
not understand? Judas Iscariot was drawn by the Father and given to Jesus to
fulfill Scripture (John 17:12). He was called to be a son of destruction; he
was created as a vessel for dishonorable usage. And the hybridized Church has
also been called to fulfill Scripture about brethren betraying brethren, about
the love of many growing cold, about many false prophets coming in Jesus’ name. Perhaps the Roman Church will bring legal action against those
who profit from exposing the hybridization of Christendom. After all, judge and
jury will consist of wild or hybrid seed. But in the heavenly realm, those who
teach lawlessness have no name, nor crown. They will never enter heaven for
they are of this world, as is this movie about a murder in the Louvre. But the
mass murdering of infant sons of God isn’t yet on cultural radar scopes, for
this invisible slaughtering of the firstborn son of the last Eve fertilizes the
soil where hybrid seed brings forth its worthless crop. * * * * * "Scripture
quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001
by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All
rights reserved."
[ Archived Commentaries ][ Current Commentary ][ Home ] |