May 24, 2008 ©Homer Kizer
Printable/viewable PDF format
Commentary — From the Margins
Chapter Six: A New War Scroll
A New War Scroll, an e-book length essay that marked a transition in understanding from using typology to reread prophecy to using typology as prophecy. Chapter One appeared as the commentary dated March 27, 2008. Chapter Six is here presented:
Following the signing of the Declaration
of Independence, George
Washington and the Continental Army took on perhaps the most powerful army in
the world. It wasn’t possible for
Once a human
being—a son of disobedience—is born of spirit, lawlessness becomes
an alien mindset, an occupying force arising from within the fleshly members
that had been ruled by the “old man,” or old self. Lawlessness is
the mind and nature of the Adversary. And the infant son of God must fight
against the lawlessness that continues to reside in the flesh … the
Apostle Paul did not understand his own actions (Rom 7:15). He did not
understand why he did what he didn’t want to do and didn’t do what
he knew to do. What he concluded was that the law of God was in his mind, but
the law of sin and death continued to reside in his flesh (vv. 21–25). And this is and will be the state of every
disciple until the second Passover liberation of
Passover is about the liberation of
When the Father
As Paul commanded the saints at Corinth to deliver the man who was with his father’s wife to Satan for the destruction of the flesh (1 Cor 5:5); and as the Lord delivered first the house of Israel into the hand of the Assyrians, then the house of Judah into the hand of the Babylonians, the Lord of hosts shall cut off two parts of Israel—the sheep of the Shepherd whom He caused to be struck (cf. Zech 13:7; Matt 26:31)—and shall deliver these two parts into the hand of the Adversary and his agent for the destruction of the flesh so that their spirit might be saved in the day when judgments are revealed … the Church does not miss any part of the Tribulation. It will not go to a place of physical safety. It will not be raptured to heaven. It will not spend the Millennium in heaven while havoc reigns on earth. Instead, it will perish because of its disbelief that has become disobedience. Only a remnant of the pre-Tribulation Church will enter the last 1260 days of the seven endtime years (Rev 12:17).
The woman of
Revelation chapter 12 is
In the natural
world, the labor pains of childbirth precede the birth of the child for a short
while. For a firstborn son or daughter, the labor pains might last as long as a
day, possibly longer although today, a baby would be taken before allowing hard
labor to go on for so long. The point is the hard labor pains of childbirth
precede delivery, but when
The prophet Isaiah records,
Before she was in labor
she gave birth;
before her pain came upon her
she delivered a son.
Who has heard such a thing?
Who has seen such things?
Shall a land be born in one day?
Shall a nation be brought forth in one moment?
For as soon as
she brought forth her children. (66:7–8)
The labor pains of
the first Eve would have preceded the delivery of Cain, Abel, and Seth. But the
labor pains of the last Eve,
Again, the first 1260 days of the Tribulation are the hard labor pains of Zion bringing forth two sons, one a murderer, one righteous … in typology the visible things of this natural world reveal the invisible things of God (Rom 1:20), but they do so as a darkened [unlit] mirror.
examined, the natural things of this world form the spiritually lifeless
shadows of the things of God: physically circumcised
With light coming from behind a person and as the person observes his or her shadow and reaches up with the person’s right hand to tug on the person’s right ear lobe, the shadow will display this same motion of tugging on the ear lobe that lays to the person’s right side. Now—and here is the catch—when this darkened shadow receives a little illumination as the moon dimly reflects the light of the sun, what is seen in the shadow is not the back of the person’s head, where the light strikes the person to form the shadow, but the mirror image of the person’s face … the shadow faces the person as Theos faces Theon (John 1:1–2), with the accents over the “o” disclosing this face to face relationship imbedded within the Tetragrammaton YHWH. As the Father looked “down” from heaven upon His firstborn Son, the Son looked “upward” from the earth toward the Father, thereby continuing the relationship that had existed prior to Theos entering His creation (v. 3) as His only Son (John 3:16; 1:14), the man Jesus of Nazareth.
The Promised Land of Canaan is a type of God’s rest (Ps 95:10–11), for the “eyes of the Lord [YHWH] your God [Elohim] are always upon it, from the beginning of the year to the end of the year” (Deut 11:12). And it is entering into this “presence” of the Lord—this continual observation—that constitutes entering into His rest. Moses records, “And he [YHWH] said, ‘My presence will go with you, and I will give you rest’” (Ex 33:14), and Moses came down from the mountain not knowing “that the skin of his face shone because he had been talking with God” (Ex 34:29). And from henceforth Moses put a veil over his face except when speaking the words of the Lord and when in the tent of meeting with the Lord. The glory that radiated from Moses’ face was the ongoing testimony of the Lord that Moses had entered into His presence, into His rest. This glory was concealed from Israel by a veil that formed the shadow and copy of the veil of the temple that barred priests from entering into the Holy of holy, the presence of God, except on Yom Kipporim and then only after the high priest made an atonement for himself and for Israel.
In the shadow, the glory that shone from Moses’ face was received prior to Moses putting on the veil—Moses entered into the presence of God prior to putting on the veil—but in the reality, the veil precluded Israel from entering into God’s glory until that glory came in the form of the man Jesus of Nazareth. Then the veil was rent, top to bottom, for the eyes of the Father looked downward on His firstborn Son. The way was made by which disciples could enter into the Father’s presence face to face whereas Moses could only see the back of the Lord, for Moses entering into the presence of God formed the lifeless shadow of disciples entering His presence.
Understanding typological exegesis at a child-like level overwhelms most Christians and leaves them lost and confused, but comprehending typology as an adolescent son of God causes even greater problems, especially for biblical literalists. The son of God who has grown in grace and knowledge will reveal the concealed mysteries of God that disclose the deceit and falseness of all literalists, but this son of God will not be understood by those spiritual infants still nursing the teats of sola scriptura.
When an earthly shadow of an intangible heavenly phenomenon receives even a little illumination, disciples realize, because the first Eve’s labor pains preceded childbirth and the last Eve’s labor pains will follow childbirth, that spiritual Abel will be revealed before Cain is: today, disciples collectively form spiritual Isaac (Gal 4:21–31), but are individually either of Esau or Jacob, twins sons of Isaac that have not yet been born through Zion giving birth to a nation in a day. Paul wrote, “[W]hen Rebecca had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, though they were not yet born and had done nothing good or bad—in order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of his call—she was told, ‘The older will serve the younger.’ As it is written, ‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated’” (Rom 9:10–13). There is a correspondence between Cain and Esau, and between Abel and Jacob:
At the second Passover, unlike in the 1st-Century when salvation came first to the Jew then to the Gentile, liberation from indwelling sin and death will come first to the Gentile convert now a professed Christian then to the Jew who today denies Christ.
The nation born in a day will be liberated from indwelling sin and death prior to this nation eating the Passover sacraments of bread and wine on the night that Jesus was betrayed: today, few in Christendom take the sacraments as Jesus gave the example and as Paul commanded (1 Cor 11:23–26).
When liberated from indwelling sin, all of Christendom will be as righteous Abel was.
But when the man of sin is revealed (2 Thess 2:3), most of Christendom will rebel against God and will return to sin, thereby revealing who is of Cain; for those who rebel will seek to kill their righteous brothers.
Yet today, while both sons are in the womb of grace, the one who will be of Cain is hated by God while the one who will be of Abel is loved even though no sin is imputed to either; for the one who is of Cain does not attempt to walk uprightly as a man before God.
In order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of call, two sons strive together within Christendom, one a son of light, the other a son of darkness who has been called by God as Judas Iscariot was called so that Scripture would be fulfilled (John 17:12) … within Christendom are many sons of God called to fulfill Scripture about brothers betraying brothers and hating one another and false prophets leading disciples astray and the love of many growing cold (Matt 24:9–12). Within Christendom many disciples have been called to be made into vessels of wrath, prepared for destruction, endured for a season (Rom 9:22–23). Many have been called who will not be chosen (Matt 22:14). And disciples can today identify a large portion of these many by driving by church parking lots on Sunday mornings; for the son of God who will not attempt to enter into God’s rest while the promise of entering stands—Sabbath observance representing this rest—will take sin back inside the “Christian” shortly after being liberated from indwelling sin and death.
The son of light
who has been predestined, called, justified, and who will be glorified must
make war against the crucified (but not yet dead) old nature, the old self that
organized its thoughts through lawlessness. This son of light must keep the
fight going today against indwelling sin. This son needs to win once in a
while, and must never surrender. Never accept a defeat, even when one occurs.
Keep battling away. A liberator is on His way. Liberation is on its way. In a
Christian’s walk with God, there are many more winters spent in
But the disciple who would walk as Jesus walked is too often tripped by other disciples, sons of darkness, who label sons of light as legalists, Judaizers, heretics. The end for these sons of darkness is already recorded: they are of Esau if they only “relax” the least of the commandments (Matt 5:19), and of Cain if they break a commandment once liberated from indwelling sin. The mark they will take is the mark of death [Chi xi stigma].
earthly shadow is also the dimly illuminated mirror mirage of a heavenly
reality, and because the Prophets reveal how to transpose the image revealed by
its shadow, Moses and Aaron form the shadow and type of the endtime two
witnesses, with Aaron as the spokesman for Moses and as his older brother
disclosing that the spokesperson for the two witnesses will be the younger
brother of the other. Every genuine disciple is the younger brother of Christ
Jesus. So as Esau and Jacob correspond to Cain and Abel, and as all four form
the spiritually lifeless shadow of two endtime nations that come from one
nation born in a day (the second Passover), the two witnesses will be two
brothers who are younger brothers to Christ Jesus. And these two brothers will
light/darkness metaphor imbedded in
Scripture has been used to pit good
against evil, with these two opposing
forces wrestling like schoolboys for dominance over humanity. A simplistic
overview of Ellen G. White’s Great
Controversy has Christ Jesus wrestling Satan for the souls of humanity in a
manner similar to how the War Scroll’s angel of light fights against the
angel of darkness. In
An aside needs mentioned: Ellen G. White and other American prophets, notably Joseph Smith, pit good against evil as if they were two brothers or equals, both created by God as archangels, with God letting good fight against evil to win as much of humanity as has been predestined to be saved. However, if score were kept, the clear winner of this fight is evil. But this entire premise is a resurrection of Bishop Arius’ error that has the Father creating Jesus either in the womb of Mary or at some moment prior to the creation of the universe. The Logos who was Theos was never the servant of Theon as Lucifer, Michael, and Gabriel were and are, but was from the beginning the Helpmate of Theon as Eve was the helpmate of Adam. And beyond this, Scripture is silent. Scripture does not address whether Theos came from Theon as Eve came from Adam. This possibility would require a second and probably a third tier in the supra-dimensional realm identified as heaven. Not enough information has presently been revealed from Scripture to affirm or to refute a claim about multiple levels or tiers existing in heaven although the probability of a second tier is implied by the creation of angelic beings.
If God knows both good and evil, and if Adam knew both good and evil after he ate the forbidden fruit, was it the fruit that gave Adam this knowledge? Does that fruit have anything to do with God knowing good and evil? Or is “good” obedience to God [i.e., not eating forbidden fruit] and “evil” disobedience, or more precisely, is evil determining for oneself what is good and what is evil? If God knows both, then it logically follows that it is God who defines or determines both. Thus, within this rubric, good is doing what God says, and evil is doing all other things, beginning with usurping the authority to determine what is good.
Taking a step
back, the question must be asked, “Just how much knowledge can be
quantified in a piece of forbidden fruit?” The prophet Malachi
established the juxtaposition that returning to God amounted to bringing tithes
and contributions into the storehouse so that there would be food in the house
of God (3:6–12). Paul equated his teachings to milk, the food of infants
in the house of God (1 Cor 3:1–3) as the Gentile converts at
Jesus told the rich young ruler that only God is good (Luke 18:19). Only God has the ability to know both good and evil and to then limit activities to only “good.” But the inherent singleness of the English linguistic icon /God/contains within itself an alien concept: “God” is a house, the house in which the Father dwells, a house like that of the tent of flesh in which a disciple dwells while here on earth. Paul wrote,
For we know that if the tent, which is our earthly home, is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this tent we groan, longing to put on our heavenly dwelling, if indeed by putting it on we may not be found naked. For while we are still in this tent, we groan, being unburdened—not that we would be unclothed, but that we would be further clothed, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life. He who has prepared us for this very thing is God, who has given us the Spirit as a guarantee. (2 Cor 5:1–5)
If the new creature born of spirit is of the heavenly realm and thus of a different dimension from the tent of flesh—our earthly house [hēmōn epigeios oikia]—in which this son of God dwells, then is the house [oikodomē] not made with hands, eternal in the heavens, of a different and of a “lower” realm from the Father, whose house this is? Typologically, this would be so, and this would make for a second level or tier within the heavenly realm, with God being the “house” in which Jesus went ahead to prepare many mansions (French usage of the icon) or stays (as in legal proceedings), and with glorified disciples being of this house and even pillars in this house (Rev 3:12), but with the one who occupies the house being of a higher realm than is the house … and this is as far as Scripture allows disciples to speak intelligibly about the structure of heaven.
When Adam ate forbidden fruit (not when Eve ate, for Adam was Eve’s covering), Adam and Eve’s eyes were opened, and they realized they were naked (Gen 3:7) … they were physically naked before, but they were covered by Adam’s obedience to his creator, with this obedience functioning as a garment that concealed physical nakedness from the eyes of both the man and the woman.
Paul ups the ante: for disciples, our fleshly bodies are equivalent to Adam’s obedience in a manner analogous to the tithe of the harvest of Judean hillsides equating to disciples’ knowledge of God, with the number of disciples holding knowledge of God translating to how full the storehouse of God is with the tithes of the house of Jacob.
Intangible obedience to God in this world covers the nakedness of a disciple in the heavenly realm as a garment of animal skins covers nakedness in this world (Gen 3:21).
Jesus’ obedience in this world becomes a disciple’s covering in the heavenly realm in a manner analogous to how a physically circumcised Israelite dwelt in a tent of animal skins in the wilderness.
Thus, a disciple’s tent of flesh serves as his outer covering in this world, with the foreskin symbolizing the “covering” nature of the flesh.
Physical circumcision is a making naked of the inner creature or self, requiring that this inner self cover itself with obedience in this world in which the flesh is visible for all to see.
Circumcision of the heart is, now, a making naked of the new creature that is from heaven, requiring that this new creature, born of spirit, cover itself with obedience in the heavenly realm where spirit beings see this new creature’s nakedness.
Grace is the mantle or garment of Christ Jesus’ righteousness that covers the nakedness of disciples who are circumcised of heart … when food in the storehouse of the temple in this world equates to knowledge of God in the Church, tents of animal skins and of fabric in this world equates to garments of obedience in the heavenly realm, with disciples either covering themselves with Christ’s obedience/righteousness or attempting to cover themselves with their own obedience as Esau was covered with a coat of hair. In this era, physical circumcision for theological reasons is a rejection of Christ’s righteousness. Physical circumcision is a rejection of grace.
When the rich young ruler asked Jesus, “‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life’” (Luke 18:18), Jesus told the rich young ruler, “‘No one is good except God [Theos] alone’” (v. 19).
The linguistic icon /God/ represents obedience to the Father, with this obedience functioning as a garment or tent or house—
Jesus told Sadducees, “‘[H]ave you not read what was said to you by God [Theos]: “I am the God [Theos] of Abraham, and the God [Theos] of Isaac, and the God [Theos] of Jacob?” He is not God [Theos] of the dead, but of the living’” (Matt 22:31–32).
Remember, “In the beginning was the Word [Logos], and the Word [Logos] was with God [Theon], and the Word [Logos]” as God [Theos] (John 1:1). “And the Word [Logos] became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory: glory as [of an only one—monogenēs] from the Father” (v. 14). The man Jesus of Nazareth was the only Son of Theos (John 3:16). He was the only Son of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, not of the Father [Theon]. He was the firstborn Son of the Father, the firstborn of many sons. But He was an “only one” from the Father, for there were no others but Theos & Theon who were of the house of God in the beginning.
Obedience equates to life and is of the living, not the dead. God alone is obedient; God alone is good. And the house of God incorporates all who are obedient.
Paul cites the Psalmist and writes, “‘None is righteous, no, not one; / no one understands; / no one seeks for God’” (Rom 3:10–11 citation is from Ps 14:1–3 & 53:13).
A human being’s fleshly body will die because of the transgression of the one man, Adam. This fleshly body is the person’s covering in this world; thus, death leaves a human being as naked as eating forbidden fruit left Adam and Eve naked. But death will not leave the disciple naked for disciples have a building or house from the Father, a house in which Jesus went ahead to prepare a room (John 14:2) or a staying. This house is the Father’s house. This house is to the Father as a tent of flesh is to the disciple, meaning that this house is not the Father, nor is it the Son, both of whom dwell in the Father’s house as glorified disciples will dwell in this house, one with the Father and the Son (John 17:20–23). The house is called in Greek, —Θε (plus a case ending), and called in English (which doesn’t use case endings), God. Glorified disciples will be of this house—that is, of God—in the same way that the Father and the Son are presently of this house.
Evangelical Christendom cringes whenever the reality of what Scripture reveals about Christ (Christology) or about the nature of disciples is discussed, for that particular division of Greek Christendom (as opposed to American Christendom or Judean Christendom) quickly points to the sin of Satan:
You said in your heart,
“I will ascend to heaven;
above the stars of God
I will set my throne on high;
I will sit on the mount of assembly
in the far reaches of the north;
I will ascend above the heights of the clouds;
I will make myself like the Most High. (Isa 14:13–14)
For some reason, logically unexplainable, Evangelical Christendom has not thought through what it means to be born of spirit: if a disciple is a son of God—and the disciple is indeed a son—then it is not blasphemy for a son to call himself a son, whereas it would be blasphemous for a servant to call himself a son. Angels are servants; they can only be servants as Moses was a servant (Heb 3:5), able only to receive the promise of inheriting eternal life and not possessing such life. Disciples, however, are not servants but sons of God. They have been born of the spirit of God [pneuma Theon]; they have received actual life in the heavenly realm. And if Jesus is not ashamed to call disciples “brothers” (Heb 2:11), and if Jesus is not ashamed to identify the Father as His Father, thereby making Him the Son (John 5:17–18), then disciples should also not be ashamed to call Jesus their elder brother (Rom 8:29) and the Father their Father, for all who are glorified will dwell together in the Father’s house as one. All will be of this single house surnamed God.
Obedience covers a person in the same way that the tent of flesh covers a person—and obedience can only be manifested through the tent of flesh living by every word that has proceeded from the mouth of God. If this tent of flesh covers itself with obedience, then there is no record of debt with its legal demands standing against the tent of flesh. Death has no claim against the tent of flesh even though this tent of flesh only has physical life.
But all of humankind has sinned and come short of the glory of God, for all of humankind has been consigned to disobedience so that God can have mercy on all (Rom 11:32). So every tent of flesh—because obedience is unavailable to the person—needs a second covering, with this second covering being grace, the righteousness of Christ Jesus, the garment of Christ (Gal 3:27). And this second covering will be needed until the Son of Man is revealed through the empowerment by the Holy Spirit of the now-covered Body of Christ.
Intangible personhood is not the tent of flesh, which will perish and will leave this personhood as naked as Adam was naked in the Garden … the concept that “a person” is not the tent of flesh in which the self-aware essence of the person dwells should be readily apparent to every person who has aged beyond the person’s youthful decades: a man or a woman who has reached the age of seventy does not mentally identify him or herself as an “old” person, but as the person was when in his or her twenties or thirties. The tent of flesh will usually have weather damage of some sort, but the person dwelling within this tent of flesh has not usually weathered as the flesh has. Thus, an apparent person becomes trapped within a decaying tent of flesh, with the person’s only “out” being receipt of a new tent, a new house, a building from God. Therefore, it has been easy for the Adversary to convince first ancient and now modern philosophers that an immortal soul dwells within the person, with the consciousness of the person coming from that immortal soul. And it has been equally easy for the Adversary to convince a better educated, endtime generation that Greek Christendom promises more than it can deliver, that those attributes of personhood long attributed to the soul come from complex chemical interactions within the brain, thereby seeming to cause humans to have minds whereas the beasts of the field have only instinct and brains. (In American Christendom, this inner self-awareness is credited to an angelic being that has come from heaven to dwell within the flesh, and this false teaching has perhaps more logic than Greek Christendom’s teaching that a person receives an immortal soul from a man having his way with a woman in the backseat of a Chevrolet.)
Although ancient philosophers and theologians realized that human self-awareness was separate from the physical body, they did not have a computer to which to make an analogy: “human nature” is perhaps best described as the software of a computer’s operating system as opposed to the hardware of silicon chips, circuit boards and hard drives. This software doesn’t “wear out” as the bearings of hard drives do, but this software can be overwritten to do what it wasn’t intended to do in a way that the intrinsically rigid hardware cannot be. Hence, a person’s sexual identity can be at variance with the person’s biological plumbing, with this variance having explainable or non explainable origins. To the amusement of politically conservative radio talk show hosts, a person can mentally be in the biologically unexplainable classification of a male lesbian, a classification in which the person’s biology is male and the object of the person’s sexual interest is female, but the person’s gender identity is also female. Something happened to this operating system that doesn’t prevent it from functioning, but causes it to function in a socially unacceptable manner within the parameters of Christian mores.
Therefore, it is surprising that ancient philosophers and theologians who knew that the “self” was not the flesh did not ascribe the same characteristics to God as they saw in themselves, especially in light of Scripture disclosing that humankind was to be created in the image and after the likeness of YHWH Elohim (Gen 1:26). Greek paganism ascribed to its pantheon human characteristics of lust and love, jealousy and betrayal, but Greek Christianity was unable to envision the Father and the Son dwelling in a common house as a human father and his eldest son might dwell together.
Intangible knowledge of God in this world becomes, for a disciple, the tithes and offerings of this son of God’s increase in the heavenly realm thereby making the disciple’s increase a function of the number of infant sons of God taught the principles of God in this world by the disciple.
The battle between good and evil isn’t a wrestling match between Jesus and Satan; it isn’t a war of strategic maneuverings between the angel of light and the angel of darkness. It is, simply, acknowledging Jesus before men (Matt 10:32) as the second lawbreaker on the cross did, as opposed to mocking Jesus as the first lawbreaker did. Both lawbreakers asked Jesus for what was possible for Him to do. Jesus could have saved Himself (John 19:11), but His kingdom was not of this world (John 18:36). It was absolutely necessary that He be made sin in order for Him to die, for though tempted in all things as all of humanity has been, He never sinned. He never placed Himself in bondage to sin and death. The Cross had no lawful claim to His life, as the second lawbreaker acknowledges. Jesus voluntarily accepted death on a cross, thereby making Himself His Father’s sacrificial Lamb, slain from the foundation of the world.
The reality of the human experience hasn’t been a battle between good and evil, for none are good but God alone, but the struggle for life against the inevitability of death. The Apostle Paul writes, “Did that which is good [the law], then bring death to me? By no means! It was sin [lawlessness — from 1 John 3:4], producing death in me through what was good, in order that sin might be shown to be sin, and through the commandments might become sinful beyond measure” (Rom 7:13).
The Apostle Paul says that which is good, spiritual, and holy produced death in him by revealing to him the nature of the lawlessness in which he was enslaved. He writes elsewhere that death through lawlessness entered the world through one man and spread to all of humanity, but that this lawlessness is not counted against humanity where there is no law (Rom 5:13). Sin isn’t revealed to be exceedingly sinful where there is no law, and as such isn’t counted against humanity. A person is judged by what has been revealed to the person.
The three crosses
Again, all disciples sin even after being born from above. But those sins are covered by the blood of Jesus of Nazareth, who said drink of this cup, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins (Matt 26:28). Sins are covered by the blood of the Passover covenant. But those disciples who have consistently neglected to take the Passover sacraments on the night that Jesus was betrayed have voluntarily removed themselves from this covenant. They knowingly or unknowingly ask the Father to deliver them to Satan—they will not last long when liberated from indwelling sin.
The second lawbreaker to speak rebuked the first: ‘“Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation. And we indeed justly, for we are receiving the due reward of our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong’” (Luke 23:40–41). This second lawbreaker asked only that he be remembered when Jesus received His kingdom (v. 42), and this second lawbreaker was justified. This second lawbreaker received the promise of everlasting life.
lawbreaker was just as guilty of transgression as the first, but he
acknowledged God and Christ Jesus, and he acknowledged his own guilt and the
justice of his sentence to death. In doing so, he demonstrates that he knows
God, knows that Jesus is unworthy of death and is as such being sacrificed, and
he demonstrates that he knows the law is good. The Apostle Paul writes that the
Israelite who lives by the righteousness that comes by faith (Rom 10:6 — cf. Deut 30:11–14) has only to
confess with the mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in the heart that the
Father raised him from the dead to be saved (Rom 10:9). So when the second
lawbreaker confesses the justice of his death, he places himself into the
lawbreaker knows what his judgment shall be; his judgment has been revealed. He
is one of a few exceptions whose judgment is revealed prior to Jesus coming in
power as the Messiah. But this lawbreaker doesn’t precede Jesus to
is today upon the household of God (1 Pet 4:17), and every word uttered
determines the disciple’s fate, the reason for yeas to be unadorned yeas,
and nays to be nays. But if judgment is upon a disciple today, and if the disciple
is given the criteria by which he or she will be judged, then the disciple has
also been given control of the disciple’s fate. So yes, a provision of
Ultimately, since all disciples sin, a disciple’s judgment is reduced to whether the disciple will cover his or her sins by the blood of the Lamb of God. If the disciple will drink from the cup as Jesus established the example, then the disciple chooses life and covers the new creature with the obedience of Christ. If the disciple determines for him or herself what is good and if the disciples either doesn’t drink of the cup or drinks from an alien cup, the disciple chooses death. The disciple would not hear the words of Jesus and believe the One who sent Him.
Death by crucifixion differs from other forms of civil execution in that physical life was extended beyond legal death. A beheaded person died instantly. A person drawn and quartered died within moments or minutes of being drawn. But a person crucified could hang around for a day or longer before he tired enough he could no longer raise himself on the nails to breathe: crucifixion kills by taking away breath. A person lives by receiving the physical breath given to Adam. A son of God lives by receiving the spiritual breath of God [pneuma Theon] given to the last Adam (Matt 3:16). So crucifixion is the one form of execution that physically symbolizes a spirit being or a born-from-above disciple losing spiritual life by being cast into the lake of fire. The symbolism of crucifixion works far better than burning at the stake. But equally important, this form of execution allows for conversation after legal death, which came with being raised up. As such, crucifixion becomes a graphic representation of spiritual life imprisoned in time.
Again, the battle between good and evil isn’t a wrestling match between Jesus and Satan, and it isn’t a war of strategic maneuverings between the angel of light and the angel of darkness, sons of light and sons of darkness. It is, simply, acknowledging Jesus before men (Matt 10:32) as the second lawbreaker on the cross did, as opposed to mocking Jesus as the first lawbreaker did.
Obedience to God
means abandoning Satan, and joining the other side … my German professor
taught English in the University in
* * *
When pagan Greek philosophers gained control
of the Jesus Movement following the Jewish rebellions in the 1st and
2nd Centuries CE, a differing form of Christianity emerged than had
earlier existed when its center was
* * * * *
"Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved."